Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list.

• This is not a forum for general discussion of the page’s subject.
• Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
• Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
• New to Commons? Check out the project scope. Ask questions, get answers.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Scope format for works of art

Hi, Please see Commons talk:Valued image scope#Scope format for works of art. Thanks, Yann (talk)

Incorrect scope

According to COM:VIC an image "can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR". But it's not the first time I see valued images that are in an incorrect scope - for example incorrectly identified organisms like this one File:Dicranocephalus_sp._MHNT.jpg. It was voted for the scope "Dicranocephalus albipes dorsal view" but it's not in that scope because it's a different species. Obviously they should be demoted in the given scope. What's the procedure for that? --Exonie (talk) 00:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

• The vote is canceled the image is renamed. The new entity may be submitted to a new vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Misidentified: File:Honey bee (Apis mellifera cypria).jpg

It is clearly not Apis mellifera, let alone Apis mellifera cypria. I try to get a better identification for it in de:Wikipedia:Redaktion Biologie/Bestimmung Kersti (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Discussion of interest for page watchers

Commons talk:Quality images candidates#Request for input: Quality images by user (and similar pages). — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)