Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rake Art Ecrehous 0112.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rake_Art_Ecrehous_0112.jpg[edit]

Merged into this DR by User:Dcoetzee:

Ongoing copyright dispute between Jersey Tourism and photographer regarding usage rights. JerseyTourism (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (for now). I think more information needs to be provided. Such as the proof that this dispute is going into court or has been settled in such a way that the copyright has never been with the person who released these images under CC licence. Also note, that if the settlement has transfered the copyright, that has no merit, as CC licence is non-revocable. P.S. Please count this vote for all the images with the same reason. Beta M (talk) 08:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Jersey Tourism can have the photographer contribute if necessary? Both parties want these images removed. Danny Evans www.dannyphoto.com owns the copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JerseyTourism (talk • contribs) 3. November 2011, 11:50 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 10:14, 7 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

  • That doesn't truly answer the question that i've asked. Was the party that released the images under the free licence not authorised to do that at the time? If one was, then CC licences are non-revocable, even if you want it removed later. The only time that it will be removed is if the party that released them was committing the criminal offence of copyright infringement. Then the licence itself is not valid, and then the image must be removed. Beta M (talk) 16:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no proof that User:JerseyTourism is actually Jersey Tourism and that anything about this dispute is true. Else please send an e-mail to OTRS (COM:OTRS). Rosenzweig τ 22:06, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]