User talk:Chatsam

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Chatsam!

--SieBot 17:19, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

archive[edit]

User talk:Chatsam/archive


Blason de la commune de Xouaxange[edit]

Bonjour Chatsam, Je te contacte de la part de la municipalité de Xouaxange (57). Accepterais-tu que la mairie puisse utiliser le blason que tu a redessiné pour Wikipédia ? Sous quelles conditions ? Je t'invites à répondre directement au maire de Xouaxange à mairiexouaxange@wanadoo.fr Merci d'avance pour ton retour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorran63 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why ?[edit]

Why do you cancel this category ? --DenghiùComm (talk) 12:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

because is not good.--Chatsam (talk) 12:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is this an answer ? --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
vilene in herarldique "sex in différent color" not in erection. --Chatsam (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Renommage monogramme[edit]

Bonjour, je ne comprends pas très bien ta demande de renommage. Il s'agit de la marque du parfum Chypre [1]. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 21:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

on m'a demandé de faire ce fichier avec ce nom donc merci de laisser comme demandé. ou de voir avec DDupard --Chatsam (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ce n'est pas un argument Face-smile.svg. Le problème est de choisir un nom qui ne prête pas à confusion, ce qui était le cas du nom du fichier et de sa description antérieurs, laissant croire qu'il s'agissait du monogramme d'une personne, alors qu'il s'agit de la marque d'un produit. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 21:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
moi je m'en moque. c'est à voir avec lui car c'est sa demande. --Chatsam (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
C'est toi qui les a téléversés. Je crains d'ailleurs que, s'agissant de dérivatifs de créations originales protégées par une marque déposée, les fichiers ne puissent être conservés sur Commons. Voir COM:PACKAGING. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 21:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
si le logo avait été celui de Chypre je l'aurais pas fait mais la c'est les initiales de coty. peu m'importe j'ai laissé un mot à DDupard. bye. --Chatsam (talk) 08:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Je ne mets pas en doute ta bonne foi, mais il s'agit manifestement du logo du parfum comme le montre la publication ci-dessus. De quelle source es-tu partie ? Cordialement, — Racconish💬 11:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
La source initiale donnée est là: [2] + click on the image.--DDupard (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
En lisant l'échange ci dessus, c'était (compris) par moi comme le monogramme d'une personne. Maintenant étant donné le succès iconique du parfum, (et du créateur - à cette époque), il a été enregistré et apposé sur l'emballage du produit.--DDupard (talk) 12:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chatsam, merci de veiller à respecter Commons:DW/fr (si pas clair me demander). Cordialement, — Racconish💬 12:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Oui pas clair, c'est quoi un changement de licence vers une licence plus appropriée, pourriez vous aider, clarifier, pointer vers texte ad hoc ?--DDupard (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Il y a deux aspects ici. Le premier concerne la notion d’œuvre dérivée, au sens de la recommandation que j'ai indiquée ci-dessus. Une œuvre dérivée, en particulier une reproduction, ne confère généralement pas de droit patrimonial à son créateur, la titularité restant entre les mains du détenteur des droits sur l’œuvre sous-jacente/reproduite. Pour cette raison, j'ai signalé à Chatsam qu'il faut veiller à bien préciser la source des oeuvres dérivées téléversées sur Commons, afin que l'on puisse vérifier si cette source est dans le domaine public ou sous une licence libre autorisant les œuvres dérivées. Le second problème, qu'une telle précision aurait permis de repérer plus rapidement, est qu'en la circonstance l’œuvre adaptée est une création originale, revendiquée comme telle dans un enregistrement de copyright, figurant sur un emballage. En résumé, tout le monde peut se tromper mais c'est une bonne pratique à appliquer que d'indiquer la source et de ne pas faire comme si le seul fait d'avoir redessiné quelque chose vous conférait un droit patrimonial sur ce dessin. Je prends un exemple concret : File:Sceau de François Coty.svg. L'image d'origine est dans le domaine public en raison de son ancienneté. Celle téléversée sur Commons en est une oeuvre dérivative et devrait soit porter une indication de domaine public, si l'on considère que le dessin est une copie fidèle, soit porter la double indication d'une source dans le domaine public et d'une adaptation mise sous licence CC-BY-SA. Mais la seule indication d'une licence CC-BY-SA avec la seule attribution à Chatsam est insuffisante. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 08:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pour ce dernier cas, il s'agit d'une adaptation reprenant les meubles du modèle (des modèles) : phoenix (la représentation de l'oiseau est en effet différente) + tertre + étoiles. Merci de bien vouloir aider en indiquant aussi précisément que possible ce qu'il conviendrait d'ajouter.--DDupard (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Déjà dit ci-dessus : il faut indiquer la source de l’œuvre dérivée et son statut en matière de copyright. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 18:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Excusez, mais je ne comprends toujours pas ce qu'il faut ajouter, je cite : il faut indiquer la source de l’œuvre dérivée et son (se réfère à quoi) statut en matière de copyright, n'est ce pas déjà le cas ?--DDupard (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Son → celui de la source. Par ailleurs, mes remarques ci-dessus s'adressaient à Chatsam. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 06:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, j'interviens ici juste parce que je me sens une responsabilité, Chatsam a réalisé un travail graphique très réussi et très utile, je lui en suis reconnaissante. Je ne voudrais pas qu'elle rencontre des difficultés pour cela. Je comprends également que vous souhaitez l'informer des indications à porter sur le fichier après téléchargement. Hey, Cheers, Bon weekend! --DDupard (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Je me réjouis que vous ayez compris le sens de mon intervention. Il ne s'agit pas de "morigéner" qui que ce soit pour une erreur mais d'expliquer pourquoi l'image ne peut pas rester sur Commons, le cas échéant, et de donner les conseils appropriés. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 10:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Maison forte de Mornay 106.jpg[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Maison forte de Mornay 106.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 12:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bon, @Chatsam: , j'ai ajouté le nom du graveur qui est mort environ 1912, donc ça devrait être ok pour Domaine public (PD), l'artiste est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, => normalement les droits d'auteur sont expirés. Si tu pouvais donner une source pour la photo ; bouquin, musée, ça devrait satisfaire tout le monde. Cheers.--DDupard (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

merci ça devait être un livre mais ça remonte à trop loin. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 08:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chypre monogram.svg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Chypre monogram.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted original creation [3]
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

— Racconish💬 12:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chypre Monogram 2.svg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Chypre Monogram 2.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted original creation [4]
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

— Racconish💬 12:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Un grand merci à l'artiste wiki graphiste. DDupard (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
merci et à bientôt. --Chatsam (talk) 08:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:-G7Biarritz (48632643511).jpg[edit]

N'y a-t-il pas un blason sur la photo? J'aurais aimé la classer dans une catégorie plus précise, mais j'ai cru bien faire en le laissant aux experts. —Iketsi (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

coucou,
Généralement quand c'est pas un élément majeur de la photo je le "déclasse" si je puis dire.
Vu que je ne sais pas dans quoi le classer!!! Je viens de mettre dans "coats of arms of France to be classified" sauf que cette catégorie est rarement nettoyé. a+ dans le bus Chatsam (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hôpital Laennec de Paris carre jardin 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôpital Laennec de Paris carre jardin 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Kindness Barnstar Hires.png The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Merci pour le message sur ma page de discussion, même si c'est un simple conseil, cela m'a été très utile !! A history lover (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rejoignez le jury WLM de l’édition 2021[edit]

Bonjour Chatsam

La nouvelle édition de WLM est en cours de préparation comme vous pouvez le voir sur rétro-planning Wiki_Loves_Monuments - 2021
La composition du jury est en cours de constitution.
En tant que lauréat de l'édition précédente, accepteriez-vous de participer cette année ?

Votre rôle consistera principalement à sélectionner les lauréats de l'édition 2021 selon ce qui expliqué sur le fonctionnement du jury et, si vous avez le temps, de participer à l'animation du concours durant le mois de septembre avec la photo du jour.

Il consistera également à accompagner le/la président/e du jury pour la rédaction du discours comme dans l'exemple de 2018

Au plaisir de vous lire,
Pour le concours français de WLM, ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cher Chatsam, plusieurs réponses favorables nous ont été retournées. Le groupe est donc complet. Toutefois, pourriez-vous nous indiquer si vous accepteriez de rejoindre le jury pour l'édition 2022. Au plaisir de vous lire ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus généralement, il faut indiquer le nom du peintre (et si possible un lien ou la date de son décès) pour toutes les images que vous avez importees. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason ville fr Caraman 31.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Blason ville fr Caraman 31.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

180.214.233.87 03:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parthenay buste robert bigot.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Parthenay buste robert bigot.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:CB00:A05:D100:94E9:EEDF:487F:36B0 19:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My files[edit]

Delete all my files — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaziFarid099 (talk • contribs) 08:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ArkéoTopia (talk) 15:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 07.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ArkéoTopia.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Maison Falleur de Trélon 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : ArkéoTopia.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason mours.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Blason mours.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason nointel.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Blason nointel.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pile de bagdad.svg[edit]

Hi! Thanks for telling me that you've reverted my edits, but what was the problem? --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I used the Commons:SVG Translate tool to add an English translation of the text, in addition to the French, not replacing it. This meant that the image used French text when it appeared on on fr.wikipedia.org, and English text on en.wikipedia.org. Was that not working properly? I checked fr.wikipedia.org after making my changes, and I thought the text was showing in French.
(Thank you for making the diagram!) --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]